Agriculture and its corresponding farms are an integral part of every society/country. In recent years, the energy consumption by farms has risen as sophisticated technologies (that require a high amount of energy) are used for the pre-processing/storage of farm produce. In a bid to advance the transition toward cleaner energy consumption in farms, the thermodynamic assessment of two innovative high-performance solar-based multigeneration systems is presented in this study. Based on the identified most crucial energy needs in farms, the multigeneration systems are designed to produce electrical power, cooling/refrigeration effect, hydrogen, and domestic hot water. In comparison to existing literature, this study is novel as it analyzes the daily performance of the multigeneration systems based on the integration/comparison of two storage techniques. While thermal storage is integrated with one multigeneration system (MGS-TS), the power-to-hydrogen conversion and use of the hydrogen in a solid oxide fuel cell is considered as the storage mechanism in the second system (MGS-SOFC). To analyze the daily performance of the systems, solar parabolic trough collectors are used to produce the input thermal energy based on a 6-hour availability timeframe per day, and the storage systems are designed to power the system for the remaining 18 h. The multigeneration systems developed are analyzed using the energy/exergy approach while the economic costs of the systems are also compared. The effect of different crucial parameters including, ambient temperature, discharge periods, dispatch rates, etc. on key variables related to the systems is investigated. Based on the performance assessment of the two high-performance systems modeled in this study, the overall energetic and exergetic efficiencies are 55.37% and 53.70% for MGS-TS, and 51.12% and 46.82% for MGS-SOFC. The total daily electricity, cooling/refrigeration effect, and hot water useful outputs from the two multigeneration systems are 61,630 kWh/day, 7,939.1 kWh/day, and 125,178 Liters/day for MGS-TS; and 34,597 kWh/day, 15,504 kWh/day, and 129,686 L/day for MGS-SOFC respectively. While the performances of the two systems differ slightly, the unique advantages of each are embedded in their useful energy products.
Information 
Anbieter/Quelle 
Material 
Beurteilung