for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
Agri-pv systems
Electricity
DC
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Companies, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Electricity
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Abidin, Mahyuddin, Zainuri
Journal: Sustainability (Switzerland)
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147846
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/14/7846
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia and Universiti Teknologi Mara Malaysia (UiTM). This research was funded by Universiti Sains Malaysia under Research University (Rui) Grant (1001/PELECT/8014088), the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering KPI fund and the USM RCMO incentive fund
Author location: Malaysia
Corresponding author email: nasiruddin@usm.my
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.