for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Wood log, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Solid biomass conversion
Woodchip gasifiers (CHP)
Electricity
DC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Irrigation, Biogas/biomethane
Hardware, Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Fouladi, Alnouss, Bicer, Al-Ansari
Journal: Case Studies in Thermal Engineering
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/case-studies-in-thermal-engineering
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2022.102024
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214157X22002702?via=ihub
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Qatar National Research Fund (a member of Qatar Foundation) provided by GSRA grants no. GSRA6-1-0416-1901 and the National Priorities Research Program (NPRP) grant No
NPRP11S-0107–180216
Author location: Qatar
Corresponding author email: talansari@hbku.edu.qa
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.