for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Pellets, Wood log, Energy crops, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Solid biomass conversion
Multiple methodologies
Electricity
DC
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: Casau, Dias, Matias, Nunes
Journal: Resources
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/resources
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11040035
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/11/4/35
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
This research is a result of the project BioAgroFloRes—Sustainable Supply Chain Management Model for Residual Agro-forestry Biomass supported in a Web Platform supported by the FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia/MCTES, through national funds and, when applicable, co-financed by the FEDER, under the new partnership agreement PT2020, grant number
PCIF/GVB/0083/2019. L.J.R.N. was supported by proMetheus—Research Unit on Energy, Materials and Environment for Sustainability—UIDP/05975/2020, funded by national funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia. This work is also a result of the project TECH—Technology,
Environment, Creativity and Health, Norte-01-0145-FEDER-000043, supported by the Norte Portugal Regional Operational Program (NORTE 2020), under the PORTUGAL 2020 Partnership Agreement, through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
Author location: Portugal
Corresponding author email: leonelnunes@esa.ipvc.pt
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.