for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
Survey
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Crops
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: Meza-SepĂșlveda, Castro, Zamora, Gallego, Camargo-RodrĂguez
Journal: Agronomy
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11040693
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/4/693
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Ministry of Science and Technology of Colombia and Newton Fund, UK in the Call Institutional Links
Author location: Colombia
Authors` other locations: United Kingdom
Corresponding author email: adriana.gallego.02@gmail.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.