for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Sewage treatment plant gas and biogases
Solid biomass conversion
Pellet gasifiers (CHP)
Chemical energy
Gaseous fuels
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Energy generator, Companies, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Biogas/biomethane
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Viswanathan, Abbas, Wu
Journal: Waste Management
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/waste-management
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.03.018
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0956053X22001532?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Ministry of Science and Technology of R.O.C. (Taiwan) under grant 1072211E006101, the Ministry of Education of R.O.C. (Taiwan) under grant 107RSG0011 and National Cheng Kung University Grants-NCKU 90 and Beyond for Research Fellow with grant number HUB110-22 T-3-028 and D111-G2316
Author location: Taiwan
Corresponding author email: weiwu@gs.ncku.edu.tw
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.