for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
PV panels floating on water
Electricity
Open-field agriculture
Farmer
Vehicles, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Electric tractors, Electricity
Software, Methodology, Complete solution
Project`s acronym: LIFE+ REWIND
Project funding type: EU
Project funding source: LIFE
Project coordinator: Universidad de Zaragoza
Coordinator location: Spain
Coordinator email / Contact form: citior@gmail.com
Project status: Finished
Total budget: 1 562 994 EUR
Two renewable energy prototypes were installed at Viñas del Vero, the main winery in the Somontano region, Aragon, Spain. The first prototype is a photovoltaic system that feeds all the energy needed for the winery’s wastewater treatment plant. It includes an innovative set of photovoltaic panels floating on the wastewater treatment pond. The second prototype is an off-grid photovoltaic system that feeds all the energy needed for a drip irrigation system in the vineyard. Due to the seasonality of irrigation, there is an excess of energy that is used to produce hydrogen by electrolysis of water. This hydrogen is used to feed an all-terrain electric vehicle that has been equipped with a fuel cell.
Some of the reductions achieved:
• Electrical consumption of 53,902 kWh per year (expected: 23,000 kWh per year);
• CO2 emissions of 13,476 kg/year (expected: 5,543 kg/year);
• NOx emissions of 29.21 kg/year (expected: 11.82 kg/year);
• SO2 emissions of 20 kg/year (expected: 8.35 kg/year);
• Nuclear high level waste of 0.02749 kg/year.
• Diesel consumption of 2,621 l/year (expected: 2,519 l/year);
The use of hydrogen-powered vehicle led to a reduction in:
• Fuel consumption of 1,010 l/year (expected: 912 l/year);
• CO2 emissions of 2,713 kg/year (expected: 2,544 kg/year);
• SO2 and NOx emissions of 0.0202 kg/year and 29.58 kg/year;
Files: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.