for Soil carbon sequestration
Tillage (conservation agriculture + CTF)
Open-field agriculture
Farmer
Agricultural field practices
Tilling/ploughing
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Maike Krauss, Reiner Ruser, Torsten Müller, Sissel Hansen, Paul Mäder, Andreas Gattinger
Journal: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/agriculture-ecosystems-and-environment
Publication date: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.01.029
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880917300397
Open access: Yes
Corresponding author email: maike.krauss@fibl.org
Highlights:
• First study comparing climate impacts of tillage systems in organic arable farming.
• No tillage system impact on N2O and CH4 emissions in grass-clover and wheat.
• Higher N2O pulses after tillage operations with increasing soil organic carbon.
• Higher soil organic carbon stocks with reduced tillage in slurry fertilised fields.
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.