for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Sewage treatment plant gas and biogases
Biogas/biomethane production
Anaerobic digestion technologies
Electricity
DC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Policy makers
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Biogas/biomethane
Other
Authors: Bettina Bluemling, Arthur P.J.Mol, Qin Tu
Journal: Energy Policy
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/energy-policy
Publication date: 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.035
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421513008288
Open access: No
Related project: rojectRenErGo (Renewable Energy Governance in China and the EU,CO-REACH 64-090) and project SURE (08-PSA-E-02).
Article funding source:
The Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW)
Author location: Netherlands
Authors` other locations: China
Corresponding author email: bettina.bluemling@wur.nl
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.