for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
PV-arrays
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Irrigation, Electricity
Other
Authors: Kerstin Wydra, Martina Jaskolski, Lukas Wagner, Essam Sh. Mohamed
Journal: Journal of Photonics for Energy
Journal link: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/journal-of-photonics-for-energy/volume-9/issue-4
Publication date: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.9.043108
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Scholarship support of the German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU), research support from the American University in Cairo in the form of a Faculty Research Grant, and the Newton Fund for funding research on solar pumping in the Western Desert, carried out in partnership with Gloucestershire University and Bangor University
Author location: Germany
Authors` other locations: Egypt
Corresponding author email: kerstin.wydra@fh-erfurt.de
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.