for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
Agri-pv systems
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Irrigation, Electricity
Hardware, Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Simon Parkinson, Julian Hunt
Journal: Environmental Science and Technology Letters
Journal link: https://pubs.acs.org/toc/estlcu/7/7
Publication date: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00349
Article link: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00349
Open access: No
Related project: Horizon 2020 Research and 2Innovation Programme undergrant agreement No. 821124(NAVIGATE)
Article funding source:
The European Union
Author location: Austria
Authors` other locations: Canada
Corresponding author email: parkinso@iiasa.ac.at
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.