for Soil carbon sequestration
Nutrient management
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Tilling/ploughing
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Miguel A. Repullo-Ruibérriz de Torres, Manuel Moreno-García, Rafaela Ordóñez-Fernández, Antonio Rodríguez-Lizana, Belén Cárceles Rodríguez, Iván Francisco García-Tejero, Víctor Hugo Durán Zuazo
Journal: agronomy
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11020387
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/11/2/387
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
This research was funded by the Operative National Group CARBOCERT and by the project PP.AVA.AVA2019.007: Gestión del suelo y tecnologías de la fertilización nitrogenada para la mejora agronómica y medioambiental, 80% co-supported by the European Union via FEDER funds, Operational Program ‘FEDER de Andalucia 2014–2020’.
Author location: Spain
Corresponding author email: mangel.repullo@juntadeandalucia.es
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.