for Energy efficiency improvement
Precision agriculture
Pesticide reduction
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Pest control (crop protection)
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: ZHAN, YANG, LOMMEL, ZHOU
Journal: Journal of Integrative Agriculture
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-integrative-agriculture
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.050
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311922001289?via=ihub
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
CAASTIP, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences
Author location: China
Authors` other locations: United States
Corresponding author email: yangxiuling@caas.cn
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.