for Soil carbon sequestration
Tillage (conservation agriculture + CTF)
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Tilling/ploughing
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: He, Liu, Wang, de Voil, Yu
Journal: Agricultural Systems
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/agricultural-systems
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103527
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X22001639?via=ihub
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Earth System Grid Federation, NSW Climate Change Fund, NSW Primary Industries, Meat and Livestock Australia, University of Tasmania and National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Author location: China
Authors` other locations: Australia, United States
Corresponding author email: de.li.liu@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.