for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Solar thermal
Solar thermal power plant
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Advisory services, Policy makers
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Electricity
Other
Authors: Julia Terrapon-Pfaff, Thomas Fink, Peter Viebahn, El MostafaJamea
Journal: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews
Publication date: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109259
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032119304678?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development(BMZ) (grant no. P5 E5001-0125/012)
Author location: Germany
Authors` other locations: Morocco
Corresponding author email: julia.terrapon-pfaff@wupperinst.org
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.