for Clean energy supply (Energy storage system)
Electricity storage
Multiple
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Advisory services, Policy makers
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Electricity
Methodology, Other
Authors: Anna-Lena Lane, Magdalena Boork, Patrik Thollander
Journal: Energies
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Publication date: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12183568
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/18/3568
Open access: Yes
Related project: research project Solbruket—Battery Storage for IncreasedSolar Electricity Production in Modern Agriculture, project number 44359-1
Article funding source:
Swedish Energy Agency, the Knowledge Foundation (KK-stiftelsen)
Author location: Sweden
Corresponding author email: anna-lena.lane@ri.se
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.