for Soil carbon sequestration
Crop diversification
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services
Agricultural field practices
Pest control (crop protection)
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Almagro, Re, Díaz-Pereira, Zornoza, Martínez-Mena
Journal: Soil and Tillage Research
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/soil-and-tillage-research
Publication date: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105815
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198723001824?via=ihub
Open access: No
Related project: H2020
Article funding source:
Fundación Séneca of the Murcia Region, Global Research Alliance on Agricultural Greenhouse Gases, Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, New Zealand Government, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Author location: Spain
Authors` other locations: Argentina
Corresponding author email: mbonmati@cebas.csic.es
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.