for Soil carbon sequestration
Soil and water conservation techniques
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers
Tools
Policies & Framework
Other
Authors: Francaviglia, Almagro, Vicente-Vicente
Journal: Soil Systems
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/soilsystems
Publication date: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems7010017
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-8789/7/1/17
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
Author location: Italy
Authors` other locations: Germany, Spain
Corresponding author email: r.francaviglia@gmail.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.