for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
PV-arrays
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Hardware, Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Huda Elasaad, Amy Bilton, Leah Kelley, Omar Duayhe, Steven Dubowsky
Journal: Desalination
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/desalination
Publication date: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2015.08.001
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0011916415300394?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
K. Kellogg Foundation (Grant No. P3022694)
Author location: United States
Authors` other locations: Canada, Mexico
Corresponding author email: Not available
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.