for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
Agri-pv systems
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Electricity
Hardware, Methodology, Procedure
Authors: MaxTrommsdorff, Jinsuk Kang, Christian Reise, Stephan Schindele, Georg Bopp, Andrea Ehmann, Axel Weselek, Petra Högy, Tabea Obergfell
Journal: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110694
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120309783?via=ihub
Open access: No
Related project: APV-RESOLA project
Article funding source:
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [grant numbers 033L098AN and 033L098G]
Author location: Germany
Corresponding author email: max.trommsdorff@ise.fraunhofer.de
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.