for Energy efficiency improvement
Precision agriculture
Multiple
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Energy generator, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Electricity
Hardware
Authors: Johan J. Estrada-López, Alejandro A. Castillo-Atoche, Edgar Sanchez-Sinencio
Journal: IEEE Sensors Letters
Journal link: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=7782634
Publication date: 2019
DOI: 10.1109/LSENS.2019.2948811
Article link: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8880468
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Texas A&M and Mexican National Councilof Science and Technology (CONACYT) Collaborative Research Grant 2016 and inpart by Silicon Labs and CONACYT
Author location: Mexico
Authors` other locations: United States
Corresponding author email: acastill@correo.uady.mx
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.