for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Hydro (Kinetic, Potential)
Hydropower
Multiple types of hydropower systems
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture, Greenhouses
Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Irrigation, Electricity
Other
Authors: Pedro Henrique Bof, Guilherme Fernandes Marques, Amaury Tilmant, Ana Paula Dalcin, Marcelo Olivares
Journal: Water (Switzerland)
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w13060817
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/13/6/817
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
CNPq Grant No. 201185/2011-3 and CAPES Grant No. 88881.065004/2014-01
Author location: Brazil
Authors` other locations: Chile
Corresponding author email: pedrohbof@gmail.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.