for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Pellets, Wood log, Energy crops, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Solid biomass conversion
Pellet and woodchip Gasifiers
Heat
Heat for agri-processes
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Ali Amiri, Catherine E. Brewer
Journal: Desalination and Water Treatment
Journal link: https://www.deswater.com/home.php
Publication date: 2019
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2020.25130
Article link: https://www.deswater.com/DWT_articles/vol_181_papers/181_2020_113.pdf
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Cooperative agreement between the Water Resources Research Institute at New Mexico State University and the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation
Author location: United States
Corresponding author email: cbrewer@nmsu.edu
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.