for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Wood log, Energy crops, Wood chips)
Solid biomass conversion
Multiple
Chemical energy
Gaseous fuels
Open-field agriculture
Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Other
Authors: Blas Mola-Yudego, Javier Arevalo, Olalla Díaz-Yáñez, Ioannis Dimitriou, ElliotFreshwater, Antti Haapala, Tahamina Khanam, Mari Selkimäki
Journal: Biofuels
Journal link: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/tbfu20/current
Publication date: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2016.1271627
Article link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17597269.2016.1271627?needAccess=true
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Swedish Research Council (Svenska Forskningsra det Formas) [grant number 2014-245]; Swedish Energy Administration (Energimyndigheten) [grant number P35138-1]
Author location: Finland
Authors` other locations: Norway, Sweden
Corresponding author email: blas.mola@uef.fi
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.