for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Wood log, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Solid biomass conversion
Multiple
Chemical energy
Solid fuels
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Procedure, Other
Authors: Ji Gao, Aiping Zhang, Shu Kee Lam, Xuesong Zhang, Allison M. Thomson, Erda Lin, Kejun Jiang, Leon E. Clarke, James A. Edmonds, Page G. Kyle, Sha Yu, Yuyu Zhou, Sheng Zhou
Journal: GCB Bioenergy
Journal link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/17571707/2016/8/5
Publication date: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12305
Article link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.12305
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Ministry of Science and Tech- nology of the People’s Republic of China (2013BAD11B03 and 2012CB955801) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (71373142)
Author location: China
Authors` other locations: Australia, United States
Corresponding author email: lined@ami.ac.cn
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.