for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Pellets, Wood log, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Solid biomass conversion
Multiple
Chemical energy
Solid fuels
Open-field agriculture, Livestock, Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Other
Authors: Branka Nakomcic-Smaragdakis, Zoran Cepic, Natasa Dragutinovic
Journal: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13640321
Publication date: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.118
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115015014?via=ihub
Open access: No
Related project: Projects II-42004, III-42006, III-42011 and III-46009
Article funding source:
Ministry of Education andScience of Republic of Serbia
Author location: Serbia
Corresponding author email: nakomcic@uns.ac.rs
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.