for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Wood log, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Solid biomass conversion
Multiple techniques of solid biomass conversion
Chemical energy
Solid fuels
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: Elias W. Gabisa, Shabbir H. Gheewala
Journal: Biomass and Bioenergy
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/biomass-and-bioenergy
Publication date: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.02.009
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953418300400?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi forfinancial support from Petchra Pra Jom Klao Research Scholarship and also the Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi
Author location: Thailand
Authors` other locations: Ethiopia
Corresponding author email: shabbir_g@jgsee.kmutt.ac.th
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.