for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Agricultural residues)
Biogas/biomethane production
Anaerobic digestion technologies
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Companies, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Alexis Sagastume, Jorge M. Mendoza, Juan J. Cabello, Jesús D. Rhenals
Journal: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy
Journal link: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/index
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10705
Article link: https://econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/10705
Open access: Yes
Related project: the University of Córdoba for the support through the project No. FI-05-17 of 2019, and to the Colombian Scientific Program for the support through the project from the Scientific Ecosystem (contract No. FP44842-218- 2018)
Author location: Colombia
Corresponding author email: asagastu1@cuc.edu.co
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.