for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Wood log, Energy crops, Agricultural residues, Wood chips)
Biogas/biomethane production
Anaerobic digestion technologies
Chemical energy
Gaseous fuels
Open-field agriculture
Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Biogas/biomethane
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: Stanisław Bielski, Renata Marks-Bielska, Anna Zieli ́nska-Chmielewska, K ̨estutis Romaneckas, Egidijus Šarauskis
Journal: Energies
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/energies
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092465
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/9/2465
Open access: Yes
Related project: Regional Initiative of Excellence” for the years 2019–2022, Project No. 010/RID/2018/19
Article funding source:
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (grant No. 30.610.013-110) and inister of Science and Higher Education
Author location: Poland
Authors` other locations: Lithuania
Corresponding author email: renatam@uwm.edu.pl
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.