for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Energy crops)
Solid biomass conversion
Woodchip gasifiers (CHP)
Chemical energy
Gaseous fuels
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Policy makers, Industry
Heating and cooling of agricultural constructions, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Stables, Greenhouses, Farmer`s buildings, Crops
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: N. Saba, M. Jawaid, K. R. Hakeem, M. T. Paridah, A. Khalina, O. Y. Alothman
Journal: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews
Publication date: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.029
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114008466?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Universiti Putra Malaysia forsupporting this research through Research Grant: GP-IBT/2013/9420700
Author location: Malaysia
Authors` other locations: Saudi Arabia
Corresponding author email: jawaid@upm.edu.my
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.