for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Energy crops)
Solid biomass conversion
Woodchip gasifiers (CHP)
Chemical energy
Gaseous fuels
Open-field agriculture
Energy generator, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Crops
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Wang Yi, Faiqa Nadeem, Guangyin Xu, Quanguo Zhang, Nirmal Joshee, Nadeem Tahir
Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-cleaner-production
Publication date: 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122386
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652620324331?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
State-Sponsored Scholarship Program (NO. 201908410130), Na-tional Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.51376056,51576060), and Henan Agricultural University (30500598)
Author location: China
Authors` other locations: United States
Corresponding author email: zquanguo@163.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.