for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Biomass (Pellets, Agricultural residues)
Solid biomass conversion
Pellet gasifiers (CHP)
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Policy makers, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Solid biomass
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: ROBSON L. DA SILVA, ISABELE O. DE PAULA, JOSÉ R. PATELLI JÚNIOR, TAINARA R. C. TORRES, THIAGO V. PEREIRA
Journal: Engenharia Agricola
Journal link: https://www.scielo.br/j/eagri/
Publication date: 2017
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v37n3p433-440/2017
Article link: https://www.scielo.br/j/eagri/a/tzsTLnrHTPnKtmzxWfWW4Mm/?lang=en
Open access: Yes
Related project: R&D project “Combustão industrial em fornos cerâmicos: eficiência energética de equipamentos e do sistema operando com diferentes combustíveis”, UFGD/PROPP
Author location: Brazil
Corresponding author email: rlealsilva@hotmail.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.