for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Solar
Photovoltaics
Transparent Polymer Photovoltaics
Electricity
AC
Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Industry
Heating and cooling of agricultural constructions, Energy provision (e.g. electricity), Heat sales to district heating
Greenhouses, Electricity
Hardware
Authors: Sheng-Yung Chang, Pei Cheng, Gang Li, Yang Yang
Journal: Joule
Journal link: https://www.cell.com/joule/home
Publication date: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.005
Open access: Yes
Related project: UC-Solar Program (MRPI 328368)
Article funding source:
Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR) (FA2386-15-1-4108, FA9550e15-1e0610, and FA9550-15-1-0333), Office of Naval Research(ONR) (N00014-14-1-0648 and N00014-04-1-0434), National Science Foundation(NSF) (ECCS-1509955)
Author location: United States
Authors` other locations: Hong Kong SAR China
Corresponding author email: yangy@ucla.edu
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.