for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Sewage treatment plant gas and biogases
Biogas/biomethane production
Anaerobic digestion technologies
Chemical energy
Gaseous fuels
Open-field agriculture, Livestock
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Advisory services, Industry
Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Biogas/biomethane
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Anthony Njuguna Matheria, Freeman Ntuli, Jane Catherine Ngila, Tumisang Seodigeng, Caliphs Zvinowanda, Cecilia Kinuthia Njenga
Journal: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/renewable-and-sustainable-energy-reviews
Publication date: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.070
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118302806?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Water Research Commission (WRC)
Author location: South Africa
Corresponding author email: anthonym@uj.ac.za
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.