for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
Irrigation (pumps, drip systems etc)
Open-field agriculture, Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Á. Rubio-Aliaga, J. M. Sánchez-Lozano, M. S. García-Cascales, M. Benhamoud, A.Molina-García
Journal: Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/solar-energy-materials-and-solar-cells
Publication date: 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.06.045
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927024816302173#!
Open access: No
Related project: GICYT and Junta de Andalucía under projectsTIN 2014-55024-P and P11-TIC-800 and SénecaFoundation 19882-GERM-15
Article funding source:
GICYT and Junta de Andalucía under projectsTIN 2014-55024-P and P11-TIC-800 and SénecaFoundation 19882-GERM-15
Author location: Spain
Authors` other locations: Morocco
Corresponding author email: Not available
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.