for Soil carbon sequestration
Nutrient management
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association
Agricultural field practices
Fertilizing
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Zhangcai Qin, Shiyu Deng, Jennifer Dunn, Pete Smith, Wenjuan Sun
Journal: Environmental Research Letters
Journal link: https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/1748-9326
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac04d7
Article link: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ac04d7
Open access: Yes
Related project: rojects: DEVIL (NE/M021327/1) and Soils-R-GRREAT (NE/P019455/1)
Article funding source:
National Basic Research Program of China (2016YFA0602701), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41975113), and the Guang- dong Provincial Department of Science and Techno- logy (2019ZT08G090).
Author location: China
Authors` other locations: United Kingdom, United States
Corresponding author email: qinzhangcai@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.