for Soil carbon sequestration
Soil organic matter
Biochar from harvest residues
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Fertilizing
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: DRIES ROOBROECK, REBECCA HOOD-NOWOTNY, DIANAH NAKUBULWA, JOHN-BAPTIST TUMUHAIRWE, MAJALIWA JACKSON GILBERT MWANJALOLO, ISAAC NDAWULA, BERNARD VANLAUWE
Journal: Ecological Applications
Journal link: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/19395582/2019/29/8
Publication date: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1984
Article link: https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1984
Open access: Yes
Related project: CGIAR research pro- gram on Climat e Change, Agriculture and Food Security
Article funding source:
Austrian Development Cooperation
Author location: Kenya
Authors` other locations: Austria, Uganda
Corresponding author email: d.roobroeck@cgiar.org
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.