for Soil carbon sequestration
Nutrient management
Open-field agriculture, Livestock
Farmer, Producers association
Agricultural field practices
Fertilizing
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Zhejin Li, Peng Sui, Xiaolong Wang, Xiaolei Yang, Pan Long, Jixiao Cui, Lingling Yan, Yuanquan Chen
Journal: Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-cleaner-production
Publication date: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.113
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965261730327X?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC, 31571595), National Key Technology R&D Program of the People’s Republic of China (Project numbers:2012BAD14B03)
Author location: China
Corresponding author email: rardc@163.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.