for Soil carbon sequestration
Tillage (conservation agriculture + CTF)
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices
Tilling/ploughing
Other
Authors: Macario Rodríguez-Entrena, María Espinosa-Goded, Jesús Barreiro-Hurlé
Journal: Ecological Economics
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/ecological-economics
Publication date: 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.006
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092180091400010X?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
IA-MEC and EU-FEDER via grantSUM2008-03-C03-02 and by CICE-MICINN and EU-FEDER via grantP10-AGR-5892 and IFAPA-Andalusian Instituteof Agricultural Research and Training and the European Social FundOperative Programme of Andalusia 2007-2013
Author location: Spain
Authors` other locations: Italy
Corresponding author email: macario.rodriguez@juntadeandalucia.es
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.