for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient vehicle
Powertrain design
Open-field agriculture, Greenhouses
Companies, Industry
Vehicles
Electric tractors
Hardware, Methodology
Authors: Yanni Chen, Bin Xie, Yuefeng Du, Enrong Mao
Journal: International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering
Journal link: https://ijabe.org/index.php/ijabe/index
Publication date: 2018
DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20191201.3720
Article link: https://ijabe.org/index.php/ijabe/article/view/3720
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Thirteenth Five-Year National Key R&D Plan (2016YFD0701001)
Author location: China
Corresponding author email: xb0306@cau.edu.cn
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.