for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
Slurry acidification methodology
Livestock
Farmer
Tools
Slurry acidification methodology
Procedure
Authors: Frederik R. Dalby, Lise B. Guldberg, Anders Feilberg
Journal: PLOS ONE
Journal link: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267693
Article link: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0267693
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
This work was funded by the Danish Agricultural Agency under the Ministry of Environment and Food, Denmark (grant no. 33010-NIFA-19-725). The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors Frederik R. Dalby, Lise B. Guldberg, Anders Feilberg, and Michael V.W. Kofoed but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.”
Author location: Europe
Corresponding author email: fd@bce.au.dk
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.