for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient postharvest technologies
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Industry
Process heat/cold
Cold storages
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Xiang, Wang, Tian, Sun
Journal: Journal of Food Process Engineering
Journal link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17454530
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13764
Article link: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.13764
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
National Key R&D Program of China(2017YFD0400404), the Fundamental Research Funds for the CentralUniversities (D2190450), the Contemporary International Collaborative Research Centre of Guangdong Province on Food InnovativeProcessing and Intelligent Control (2019A050519001), and the Com-mon Technical Innovation Team of Guangdong Province on Preserva-tion and Logistics of Agricultural Products (2020KJ145).
Author location: China
Authors` other locations: Ireland
Corresponding author email: dawen.sun@ucd.ie
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.