for Energy efficiency improvement
Conservation agriculture
Crop rotation
Open-field agriculture
Contractor, Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Tilling/ploughing
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Moreno-Conn, RodrÃguez-Hernandez, Arguello, Arango, Baquero
Journal: Frontiers in Environmental Science
Journal link: https://www.frontiersin.org/
Publication date: 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.687804
Article link: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.687804/full
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
Colombian Research Corporation, Chartered Institute of Architectural Technologists, Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria, AGROSAVIA, Ministerio de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural and Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical
Author location: Colombia
Corresponding author email: lmoreno@agrosavia.co
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.