for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
Utilization of meteorological information
Open-field agriculture
Contractor, Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: Nantongo, Ssekandi, Ngom, Diouf, Noba
Journal: Environmental Development
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/environmental-development
Publication date: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100857
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221146452300057X?via=ihub
Open access: No
Author location: Senegal
Authors` other locations: Uganda
Corresponding author email: nntngbck@yahoo.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.