for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
Survey
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology, Procedure, Other
Authors: Kyire, Kuwornu, Bannor, Apiors, Martey
Journal: Journal of Agriculture and Food Research
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-agriculture-and-food-research
Publication date: 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100593
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266615432300100X?via=ihub
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
International Centre for Evaluation and Development, Irrigation Company of Upper Region and Savanna Agricultural Research Institute and United States Agency for International Development
Author location: Ghana
Corresponding author email: ckyiresamuel@gmail.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.