for Soil carbon sequestration
Tillage (conservation agriculture + CTF)
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Tools
DayCent model for simulating SOC in maize systems
Software
Authors: Nyawira, Hartman, Nguyen, Bolo, Sommer
Journal: Soil and Tillage Research
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/soil-and-tillage-research
Publication date: 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2021.105000
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198721000702?via=ihub
Open access: Yes
Article funding source:
German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit and Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers
Author location: Kenya
Authors` other locations: Australia, Germany, United States
Corresponding author email: S.Nyawira@cgiar.org
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.