for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient postharvest technologies
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Advisory services, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology
Authors: Badiee, Selahvarzi, Abedi, Sayyad-Amin
Journal: Erwerbs-Obstbau
Journal link: https://www.springer.com/journal/10341
Publication date: 2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10341-023-00861-4
Article link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10341-023-00861-4
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
Author location: Iran
Corresponding author email: Selahvarzi@um.ac.ir
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.