for Energy efficiency improvement
Efficient tool
Irrigation (pumps, drip systems etc)
Greenhouses
Farmer, Producers association
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology, Complete solution
Authors: Guilherme Lages Barbosa, Francisca Daiane Almeida Gadelha, Natalya Kublik, Alan Proctor, Lucas Reichelm, Emily Weissinger, Gregory M. Wohlleb, Rolf U. Halden 1
Journal: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Journal link: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Publication date: 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120606879
Article link: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/6/6879
Open access: Yes
Author location: United States
Corresponding author email: halden@asu.edu
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.