for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Hydro (Potential)
Hydropower
Multiple
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture
Farmer, Producers association, Energy generator, Contractor, Advisory services, Policy makers, Companies, Industry
Agricultural field practices
Irrigation
Methodology, Procedure
Authors: Zihan Lin, Jiaguo Qi
Journal: Environmental Research
Journal link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/environmental-research
Publication date: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.016
Article link: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935117308939?via=ihub
Open access: No
Article funding source:
Asian Pacific Network (ARCP2013-FP25-Wu); the NASA's LCLUC and IDS programs through their grants toMichigan State University (NNX15AD51G and NNH16ZDA001N–IDS)and the United States Department of Agriculture through theAgBioResearch at Michigan State University (MICL02264)
Author location: United States
Authors` other locations: China
Corresponding author email: qi@msu.edu
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.