for Clean energy supply (Energy production system)
Hydro (Kinetic, Potential)
Hydropower
Multiple types of hydropower systems
Electricity
AC
Open-field agriculture
Advisory services, Policy makers
Agricultural field practices, Energy provision (e.g. electricity)
Irrigation, Electricity
Other
Authors: Nadir Ahmed Elagib, Suhair A. Gayoum Saad, Mohammed Basheer, Abbas E. Rahma, Emmanuela Darius Lado Gore
Journal: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Journal link: https://www.springer.com/journal/477
Publication date: 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-019-01706-x
Article link: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00477-019-01706-x
Open access: No
Article funding source:
German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
Author location: Germany
Authors` other locations: China, Sudan, United Arab Emirates
Corresponding author email: elagib@hotmail.com
Files: --
Audio Visual Material: --
This section contains a brief assessment of the FEFTS described.
There are 3 basic categories: General, Environmental and Socioeconomic assessment.
The purpose of this assessment is to give a quick overview to the potential FEFTS user of its application benefits.
For each question, the Likert scale is used with the following possible answers:
Strongly disagree, Disagree, Neither agree nor disagree (Neutral)/non applicable, Agree, Strongly agree
Keep in mind that this assessment is subjective, based on publicly available information.
All registered users are asked to evaluate each FEFTS and when an adequate number of reviews is gathered the results depicted here are updated. Each review is screened in order to avoid malicious practices.
FEFTS providers who do not agree with the assessment results, can send their inquiry to info@agrofossilfree.eu and a direct action based on their petition will be taken.